Integrated multi-tuner satellite receiver architecture and associated method

ABSTRACT

Multi-tuner receiver architectures and associated methods are disclosed that provide initial analog coarse tuning of desired channels within a received signal spectrum, such as transponder channels within a set-top box signal spectrum for satellite communications. These multi-tuner satellite receiver architectures provide significant advantages over prior direct down-conversion (DDC) architectures and low intermediate-frequency (IF) architectures, particularly where two tuners are desired on the same integrated circuit. Rather than using a low-IF frequency or directly converting the desired channel frequency to DC, initial coarse tuning provided by analog coarse tuning circuitry allows for a conversion to a frequency range around DC. This coarse tuning circuitry can be implemented, for example, using a large-step local oscillator (LO) that provides a coarse tune analog mixing signal. Once mixed down, the desired channel may then be fine-tuned through digital processing, such as through the use of a wide-band analog-to-digital converter (ADC) or a narrow-band tunable bandpass ADC.

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] This invention relates to receiver architectures for highfrequency transmissions and more particularly to set-top box receiverarchitectures for satellite television communications.

BACKGROUND

[0002] In general, the most ideal receiver architecture for anintegrated circuit from a bill-of-material point of view is usually adirect down conversion (DDC) architecture. However, in practice, thereare several issues that often prohibit the practical design ofintegrated circuit implementations that use DDC architectures. Theseissues typically include noise from the DC offset voltage and 1/f noisefrom baseband circuitry located on the integrated circuit. In mobileapplications, such as with cellular phones, the DC offset voltage is atime varying entity which makes its cancellation a very difficult task.In other applications where mobility is not a concern, such as withsatellite receivers, the DC offset voltage can be stored and cancelled,such as through the use of external storage capacitors,. However, 1/fnoise is still an issue and often degrades CMOS satellite tuners thatuse a DDC architecture.

[0003] Conventional home satellite television systems utilize a fixeddish antenna to receive satellite communications. After receiving thesatellite signal, the dish antenna circuitry sends a satellite spectrumsignal to a satellite receiver or set-top box that is often located neara television through which the viewer desires to watch the satelliteprogramming. This satellite receiver uses receive path circuitry to tunethe program channel that was selected by the user. Throughout the world,the satellite channel spectrum sent to the set-top box is oftenstructured to include 32 transponder channels between 950 MHz and 2150MHz with each transponder channel carrying a number of different programchannels. Each transponder will typically transmit multiple programchannels that are time-multiplexed on one carrier signal. Alternatively,the multiple program channels may be frequency multiplexed within theoutput of each transponder. The total number of received programchannels considering all the transponders together is typically wellover 300 program channels.

[0004] Conventional architectures for set-top box satellite receiversinclude low intermediate-frequency (IF) architectures and DDCarchitectures. Low-IF architectures utilize two mixing frequencies. Thefirst mixing frequency is designed to be a variable frequency that isused to mix the selected satellite transponder channel to a pre-selectedIF frequency that is close to DC. And the second mixing frequency isdesigned to be the low-IF frequency that is used to mix the satellitespectrum to DC. Direct down conversion (DDC) architectures utilize asingle mixing frequency. This mixing frequency is designed to be avariable frequency that is used to mix the selected satellitetransponder channel directly to DC.

[0005] As indicated above, DDC architectures are desirable due to theefficiencies they provide. DDC architectures, however, suffer fromdisadvantages such as susceptibility to DC noise, 1/f noise and I/Q pathimbalances. DDC architectures also often require narrow-band PLLs toprovide mixing frequencies, and implementations of such narrow-band PLLstypically utilize LC-based voltage controlled oscillators (VCOs). Low-IFarchitectures, like DDC architectures, also typically require the use ofsuch narrow-band PLLs with LC-based VCOs. Such LC-based VCOs are oftendifficult to tune over wide frequency ranges and often are prone tomagnetically pick up any magnetically radiated noise. In addition,interference problems arise because the center frequency for theselected transponder channel and the DDC mixing signal are typically atthe same frequency or are very close in frequency. To solve thisinterference problem, some systems have implemented receivers where theDDC mixing frequency is double (or half) of what the required frequencyis, and at the mixer input, a divider (or doubler) translates the DDCmixing signal into the wanted frequency. Furthermore, where two tunersare desired on the same integrated circuit, two DDC receivers, as wellas two low-IF receivers, will have a tendency to interfere with eachother, and their VCOs also have a tendency to inter-lock into oneanother, particularly where the selected transponder channels for eachtuner are close together.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0006] The present invention provides integrated multi-tuner receiverarchitectures and associated methods that utilize coarse analog tunecircuitry to provide initial analog coarse tuning of desired channelswithin a received spectrum signal, such as transponder channels within aset-top box signal spectrum for satellite communications. Thesemulti-tuner receiver architectures, as described in detail below,provide significant advantages over prior direct down-conversion (DDC)architectures and low intermediate-frequency (IF) architectures,particularly where two tuners are desired on the same integratedcircuit. Rather than using a low-IF frequency or directly converting thedesired channel frequency to DC, initial coarse tuning provided byanalog coarse tuning circuitry allows for a conversion to a frequencyrange around DC. This coarse tuning circuitry can be implemented, forexample, using a large-step local oscillator (LO) that provides a coarsetune analog mixing signal. Once mixed down, the desired channel may thenbe fine-tuned through digital processing, such as through the use of awide-band analog-to-digital converter (ADC) or a narrow-band tunablebandpass ADC. The disclosed multi-tuner receiver architectures,therefore, have the efficiency of using a single mixing frequency whilestill avoiding interference and noise problems that plague DDCarchitectures.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0007] It is noted that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplaryembodiments of the invention and are, therefore, not to be consideredlimiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equallyeffective embodiments.

[0008]FIG. 1A is a block diagram for an example satellite set-top boxenvironment within which the receiver architecture of the presentinvention could be utilized.

[0009]FIG. 1B is a block diagram for example satellite set-top boxcircuitry that could include the receiver architecture of the presentinvention.

[0010]FIG. 1C is a block diagram of basic receiver architectureaccording to the present invention utilizing a large-step localoscillator.

[0011]FIG. 1D is a block diagram of an embodiment for coarse tunecircuitry.

[0012]FIG. 1E is a block diagram of an embodiment for a large-step localoscillator.

[0013]FIG. 2A is a diagram for an example channel spectrum signal withpredetermined frequency bins spanning the channel spectrum.

[0014]FIG. 2B is a diagram for an example coarse tune signal spectrum.

[0015]FIG. 2C is a diagram for an example satellite signal spectrumwhere desired channels overlap a bin local oscillator frequency or abin-to-bin boundary.

[0016]FIG. 3 is a diagram of an embodiment for a overlapping binarchitecture for an example 32 channel satellite signal spectrum for atelevision set-top box.

[0017]FIGS. 4A and 4B are example embodiments for the basic receiverarchitecture using a wide-band analog-to-digital converter and a narrowband tunable bandpass analog-to-digital converter, respectively.

[0018]FIG. 5A is a block diagram for a two receiver architecture locatedon a single integrated circuit.

[0019]FIGS. 5B and 5C are flow diagrams of example embodiments forsharing a single local oscillator frequency between two receivers.

[0020]FIGS. 6A and 6B are block diagrams for example embodiments forproviding satellite dish signals to satellite set-top box receivers.

[0021]FIG. 7A is a block diagram for an dual receiver implementation ofthe receiver architecture of the present invention using wide-bandanalog-to-digital converters.

[0022]FIG. 7B is a block diagram for an dual receiver implementation ofthe receiver architecture of the present invention using complex tunablebandpass delta-sigma analog-to-digital converters.

[0023]FIG. 7C is a block diagram of an example embodiment for convertingnegative frequencies to reduce the needed tuning range of a complextunable bandpass to positive frequencies.

[0024]FIGS. 8A is a block diagram of an embodiment for adjusting tuningerrors with respect to the complex tunable bandpass delta-sigmaanalog-to-digital converters in the embodiment of FIG. 7B.

[0025]FIG. 8B is a diagram representing the signal correction of FIG.8A.

[0026]FIG. 8C is a block diagram for a master-slave tuning arrangementbetween a tunable bandpass analog-to-digital converter (master) and atunable bandpass filter (slave).

[0027]FIG. 9A is a block diagram of a multi-stage architecture for adigital down-converter and decimator usable in the embodiment of FIG.7B.

[0028]FIG. 9B is a block diagram of example stages for the architectureof FIG. 9A.

[0029]FIG. 9C is a block diagram of example implementation of thearchitecture of FIG. 9A utilizing a fixed decimation in the non-finalstages and a variable decimation rate in the final stage.

[0030]FIG. 9D is a diagram for determining a factor (N) used in thenon-final stage implementations of FIG. 9C.

[0031]FIG. 9E is a response diagram of an example low pass filter forthe non-final stage implementations of FIG. 9C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0032] The present invention provides multi-tuner receiver architecturesand associated methods that coarse analog tune circuitry to provideinitial analog coarse tuning of desired channels within a receivedsignal spectrum. In the description of the present invention below, thesignal spectrum is primarily described with respect to a satellitetransponder channel spectrum; however, it is noted that the receiverarchitecture and methods of the present invention could be used withother channel signal spectrums utilized by other systems, if desired.

[0033]FIG. 1A is a block diagram for an example satellite set-top boxenvironment 170 within which the receiver or tuner architecture 100 ofthe present invention could be utilized. In the embodiment depicted, asatellite set-top box 172 receives an input signal spectrum fromsatellite dish antenna circuitry 171. The satellite set-top box 172processes this signal spectrum in part utilizing the receiver/tunercircuitry 100. The output from the satellite set-top box 172 is thenprovided to a television, a videocassette recorder (VCR) or other deviceas represented by the TV/VCR block 174.

[0034]FIG. 1B is a block diagram for example circuitry for a satelliteset-top box 172 that could include the receiver architecture 100 of thepresent invention. The input signal spectrum 107 can be, for example, 32transponder channels between 950 MHz and 2150 MHz with each transponderchannel carrying a number of different program channels. This signalspectrum 107 can be processed by the receiver/tuner 100 to providedigital baseband output signals 112 that represent a tuned transponderchannel. These output signals 112 can then be processed by a demodulator180 that can tune one of the program channels within the tunedtransponder channel. The output signal 181 from the demodulator, whichrepresents a tuned program channel within the transponder channel thatwas tuned by the receiver/tuner 100, can then be processed with aforward error correction decoder 182 to produce a digital output stream.This digital output stream is typically the data stream that stored bypersonal video recorders (PVRs) for later use and viewing by a user asrepresented by the PVR output stream 188. The output of the decoder 182,or the stored PVR data as represented by PVR input stream 192, can thenbe processed by video/audio processing circuitry 184 that can includeprocessing circuitry such as an MPEG decoder. The output of theprocessing circuitry 184 is typically the digital video data stream thatrepresents the program channel and is used for picture-in-picture (PnP)operations, for example, where the set-top box circuitry 172 includestwo tuners with one tuner providing the primary viewing feed and asecond tuner providing the PnP viewing feed. The output of theprocessing circuitry 184, as well as a PnP input stream 194 from asecond tuner if a second tuner is being utilized for PnP operations, canbe processed by a video/audio controller 186 to generate a video outputsignal 176 that can subsequently be utilized, for example, with a TV orVCR. Additional tuners could also be used, if desired.

[0035]FIG. 1C is a block diagram of basic receiver architecture 100according to the present invention utilizing a large-step localoscillator 106. Input signal 107, for example from a satellite dishantenna or other source, is received and passed through a low noiseautomatic-gain amplifier (LNA) 105. In the embodiments described herein,it is assumed that the input signal 107 is a signal spectrum thatincludes multiple channels, such as a satellite television signals thatincludes 32 transponder channels between the frequencies of 950 MHz and2150 MHz. The output signal 108 from LNA 105 is initially tuned withanalog coarse tune circuitry 102 utilizing a local oscillator mixingfrequency (f_(LO)) provided by large-step local oscillator (LO)circuitry 106. The large-step LO circuitry 106 also receives a coarsechannel selection signal 162. The resulting coarsely tuned signal 110 isthen subjected to digital fine tune circuitry 104 utilizing the centerfrequency (f_(CH)) 114 for the desired channel to produce digitalbaseband signals 112.

[0036]FIG. 1D is a block diagram of an embodiment for coarse tunecircuitry 102. The channel spectrum signal 108 is sent to mixers 122 and124. The output Q signal from mixer 124 is desired to be offset by aphase shift of 90 degrees from the output I signal from mixer 122. Toprovide these two signals, a local oscillator mixing frequency (f_(LO))116 and a dual divide-by-two and quadrature shift block (÷2/90°) 126 maybe utilized. The local oscillator mixing frequency (f_(LO)) 116 isdivided by two in block 126 to provide mixing signals 125 and 127. Block126 also delays the signal 125 to mixer 124 by 90 degrees with respectto the signal 127 to mixer 122. Mixer 122 mixes the channel spectrumsignal 108 with the signal 1277 to provide an in-phase signal (I) forthe coarse tune I/Q signals 110. And mixer 124 mixes the channelspectrum signal 108 with the signal 125 to provide the quadrature signal(Q) for the coarse tuned I/Q signals 110. Because the dual divide-by-twoand quadrature shift block (÷2/90°) 126 will divide the local oscillatormixing frequency (f_(LO)) 116 by two, the local oscillator mixing freqfrequency (f_(LO)) 116 will be two-times the desired mixing frequencyfor the mixers 122 and 124. It is also noted that the block 126 could bemodified, if desired, to provide any desired frequency division, such asa divide-by-four operation, assuming that a corresponding change weremade to the local oscillator mixing frequency (f_(LO)) 116 so that thedesired mixing frequency was still received by the mixers 122 and 124.It is further noted that block 126 could simply provide a quadraturephase shift and provide no frequency division, such that the localoscillator mixing frequency (f_(LO)) 116 is directly used by the mixers122 and 124 except for the 90 degrees phase shift between the two signal125 and 127.

[0037]FIG. 1E is a block diagram of an embodiment for a large-step localoscillator 106. The large-step local oscillator 106, according to thepresent invention, is designed to generate a mixing signal at one of aplurality of predetermined frequencies. The output LO frequency isselected based upon the channel within the spectrum that is desired tobe tuned. The output LO frequencies can be organized and uniformly ornon-uniformly spaced as desired. As one example, the output LOfrequencies can be a fixed bandwidth apart from each other and can spanthe entire input channel spectrum signal 108. In the embodimentdepicted, the local oscillator mixing frequency (f_(LO)) 116 isgenerated using phase-lock-loop (PLL) circuitry. The phase detector 152receives a signal 172 that represents a divided version of a referencefrequency (f_(REF)) and signal 174 that represents a divided version ofthe output frequency (f_(LO)) 116. A reference frequency (f_(REF)) canbe generated, for example, using crystal oscillator 164. The output ofthe crystal oscillator 164 is provided to divide-by-M block 166 toproduce the signal 172. The output frequency (f_(LO)) 116 is provided todivide-by-N block 156 to produce the signal 174. The dividers 156 and166 are controlled by large-step LO control circuitry 160. Based upon acoarse channel selection signal 162, which represents informationidentifying the channel that is desired to be tuned, the controlcircuitry 160 sets the dividers 156 and 166 to generate a desired outputfrequency (f_(LO)) 116. Depending upon these settings for the dividers156 and 166, the phase detector 152 and controlled oscillator 154 acttogether to provide phase-lock-loop (PLL) circuitry that attempts tolock the output frequency (f_(LO)) 116 to a selected LO mixingfrequency, as described in more detail below.

[0038] In operation, the phase detector 152 provides a control input 153to the controlled oscillator 154 in order to control the outputfrequency of the controlled oscillator 154. The nature of this controlinput 153 will depend upon the circuitry used to implement thecontrolled oscillator 154. For example, if a voltage controlledoscillator (VCO) is used, the control input 153 can include one or morevoltage control signals. If LC-tank oscillator architecture is utilizedfor the VCO, one or more voltage control signals could be used tocontrol one or more variable capacitances within the VCO circuitry.Advantageously, the large-step LO receiver architecture of the presentinvention allows for the use of less precise oscillator architectures,such as RC-based oscillator architectures. One RC-based oscillatorarchitecture that could be used is a inverter-based ring oscillatorwhere the delay of each inverter stage can be adjusting using one ormore control signals as the control input 153. It is noted, therefore,that a wide variety of oscillator architectures and associated controlsignals could be used for the controlled oscillator 154 and the controlinput 153. This wide variety of applicable architectures is in part dueto the wide-band nature of the PLL that can be utilized with thearchitecture of the present invention, which in turn causes the outputphase noise to track the phase noise of the reference oscillator over awider spectrum range thereby relaxing the required VCO phase noisespecifications.

[0039]FIG. 2A is a diagram for an example channel spectrum signal 108with predetermined frequency bins spanning the channel spectrum 208. Thechannel spectrum can include any number of different channels, such aschannel 206 with a center frequency at f_(CH), and the channel spectrumcan span any desired frequency range. With respect to satellite set-topbox receivers, for example, the channel spectrum includes 32 transponderchannels between 950 MHz and 2150 MHz. In the embodiment depicted, thespectrum 208 between frequencies f₁ and f₂ has been partitioned into Ndifferent bins, which are designated BIN1, BIN2, BIN3 . . . BIN(N−1),BIN(N). Each bin has a single pre-selected LO frequency, which aredesignated f_(LO1), f_(LO2), f_(LO3) . . . f_(LO)(N−1), f_(LO1)(N). Ifthe desired channel 206 falls within the bin, the bin LO frequency canbe used as the mixing signal to provide the down conversion of thedesired channel to a frequency range around DC. In the embodimentdepicted, channel 206 falls within BIN3, and LO frequency f_(LO3) can beused as the mixing signal. In addition, in the embodiment depicted, thewidth 202 of each bin has been selected to be the same, and the width204 between each LO frequency has been selected to be the same. It isnoted, however, that frequency bin sizes and LO frequencies can benon-uniformly distributed and can be varied or modified depending uponthe implementation desired. In addition, multiple LO frequencies per bincould be used and different numbers of LO frequencies could also be useddepending upon the implementation desired.

[0040]FIG. 2B is a diagram for an example coarse tune signal spectrum110 after it has been mixed with LO frequency f_(LO3). As depicted, thechannel spectrum 208 has been moved so that channel 206 is now centeredat a resulting frequency that is equal to the channel center frequency(f_(CH)) minus the LO mixing frequency (f_(LO3)). The spectrum 208similarly has been mixed down so that the spectrum is now between thefrequencies f₁−f_(LO3) and f₂−f_(LO3).

[0041]FIG. 2C is a diagram for an example satellite signal spectrum 208where a desired channel 252 overlaps a bin LO frequency and a desiredchannel 254 overlaps a bin-to-bin boundary. First, considering channel254, its channel center frequency (f_(CH)) is shown as sitting on top ofthe boundary between BIN(N−1) and BIN(N). As such, the LO frequencyf_(LO)(N−1) for BIN(N−1) or the LO frequency f_(LO)(N) for BIN(N) can beused as represented by the arrows identified by element number 258. Now,considering channel 252, its channel center frequency (f_(CH)) is shownas sitting on top of the LO frequency f_(LO2) for BIN2 in which channel252 falls. If LO frequency f_(LO2) for BIN2 were used to mix downchannel 252, the channel center frequency (f_(CH)) would land at DCthereby in effect causing a direct down conversion of channel 252. Thisis an undesirable result according to the architecture of the presentinvention. Thus, where the channel 252 overlaps the LO frequency for thebin in which it falls, the LO frequency for an adjacent bin can be usedas the mixing LO frequency. As depicted, therefore, instead of using LOfrequency f_(LO2) for BIN2 to mix down channel 252, the LO frequencyf_(LO1) for BIN1 or the LO frequency f_(LO3) for BIN3 can be used asrepresented by the arrows identified by element number 256, therebyavoiding direct down conversion to DC. It is noted that the decision ofwhich bin LO frequency to use can be made utilizing any of a widevariety of considerations depending upon the particular application anddesign criterion involved.

[0042]FIG. 3 is a diagram of an embodiment 300 for an overlapping binarchitecture for an example 32 transponder channel satellite signalspectrum for a television set-top box. In particular, the satellitetransponder channel spectrum 208 includes 32 transponder channelsbetween 950 MHz and 2150 MHz with each channel being about 37.5 MHzwide. As depicted, channel 308 represents the transponder channeldesired to be tuned, and element 306 represents the width of channels.As configured in the embodiment 300, there are 23 overlapping binsconfigured as 12 odd numbered bins 320 (BIN1, BIN3 . . . BIN 23) and 11even numbered bins 321 (BIN2, BIN4 . . . BIN22). The width of each oddbin 320 as designated by element 304 can be selected to be the same. Thewidth of each even bin 322 as designated by element 302 can be selectedto be the same. And the widths 320 and 322 can be selected to be thesame. As discussed above, each bin can be configured to have a LOfrequency associated with it that is located at the center of the bin asrepresented by the dotted lines, such as dotted lines 308 and 310. Thewidth between LO frequencies associated with each consecutive bin, suchas between the LO frequencies for BIN12 and BIN13, can be the same asdesignated by element 312. As such, the width between LO frequencies ofconsecutively numbered bins is half the width of the bins. For example,if widths 302 and 304 of the odd and even bins are set to 100 MHz, thewidth or frequency step between LO frequencies for consecutivelynumbered bins becomes 50 MHz.

[0043] An overlapping bin architecture, such as embodiment 300, helpsimprove the performance and efficiency of the receiver architecture ofthe present invention by providing redundancy and helping to resolvechannels whose center frequencies happen to be at the boundary betweentwo bins. As will be discussed in more detail below, it is oftendesirable to include two or more receivers in a single integratedcircuit and to reduce the frequency range within which the digital finetune circuitry 104 must operate. In selecting the bin configuration fora channel spectrum, it is advantageous to increase the frequency stepbetween LO frequencies so that adjacent LO frequencies from two or moreseparate receivers in an integrated multi-tuner satellite receiver arefar enough apart to avoid interference with each other. However, it isalso advantageous to reduce the frequency step between the LOfrequencies to reduce the frequency range within which the digital finetune circuitry 104 must operate and to relax the design specificationsfor the digital fine tune circuitry 104, such as, for example, low passfilter (LPF) circuitry and analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) circuitry.For the embodiment 300 of FIG. 3, a 50 MHz frequency step is onereasonable choice for the frequency step when considering the trade-offbetween minimizing the frequency step while still keeping adjacent LOfrequencies separated to avoid interference. It is also noted that a 10MHz frequency step may also be a desirable frequency step. And it isfurther noted that other frequency steps or configurations may be chosendepending upon the particular design requirements involved.

[0044] With respect to standard satellite tuners and a transponderchannel signal spectrum between 950 MHz and 2150 MHz, the localoscillator mixing frequency resolutions are typically on the range of100 KHz. Thus, where the frequency step is chosen to be 10-50 MHz ormore, the coarse tuning provided by the large-step oscillator of thepresent invention can provide frequency steps that are 100-times or morelarger than traditional resolutions. Because the bandwidth of PLLs thatprovide these local oscillator output signals have a bandwidths that aretypically 1/10 of the frequency step, traditional PLLs would be expectedto have bandwidths on the range of 10 KHz. In contrast, with thelarge-step local oscillator of the present invention, the bandwidth ofthe PLL would likely be more on the order of 1-5 MHz or higher,depending upon the resolution chosen for the coarse tune frequencysteps. It is noted that these numbers are provided as examples andshould not be considered as limiting the invention. The coarse analogtuning and fine digital tuning architecture discussed herein isapplicable to a wide range of applications and not limited to theseexample embodiments, frequency ranges or bandwidths.

[0045] Looking to channel 308 in FIG. 3, it is located within thechannel spectrum such that it overlaps the LO frequency for BIN2 and theboundary of BIN1 and BIN2, which are both designed to be located atabout 1050 MHz. As discussed above with respect to FIG. 2C, the LOmixing frequency f_(LO2) would not be used to avoid a direct downconversion of channel 308 to DC. Rather, the LO mixing frequency f_(LO1)for BIN1 or the LO mixing frequency f_(LO3) for BIN3 could be used tomix down the channel 308. It is noted that by having overlappingfrequency bins, an LO frequency closer to the center frequency for thedesired channel 308 could be used. For example, if only thenon-overlapping even numbered bins 322 were provided in the embodiment300, the next adjacent LO mixing frequency would have been LO mixingfrequency f_(LO4) for BIN4, which is 100 MHz from the LO mixingfrequency f_(LO2) for BIN2, rather than the 50 MHz frequency stepbetween the LO frequencies for BIN2 and BIN1 and for BIN2 and BIN3. Asstated above, overlapping bin architecture of FIG. 3 helps resolveboundary or inter-bin channels and helps reduce the bandwidth of thetuned signal thereby reducing the bandwidth requirements for theanti-aliasing filters and reducing the sampling rate requirements forADC circuitry that may be used in the digital fine tune circuitry. It isnoted that a similar result to the overlapping bin approach could beachieved by expanding the number of non-overlapping bins to reduce thefrequency step between adjacent LO frequencies. One additional benefitof the overlapping bin architecture, however, is that more than one binhas been designated as covering the same frequency range, therebyproviding a desirable level of redundancy.

[0046]FIGS. 4A and 4B are example implementations for the basic receiverarchitecture using a wide-band ADC for the digital fine tune circuitry104 and a narrow band tunable bandpass ADC for the digital fine tunecircuitry 104, respectively. In particular, embodiment 400 of FIG. 4Autilizes a wide-band ADC 402 that receives coarsely tuned signal 110 andprovides a digital output to a tunable digital filter 404, which in turnoutputs the digital baseband signals 112. For fine tuning the desiredchannel within the signal 110, the tunable digital filter 404 utilizes avariable frequency (f_(V)) 406 generated, for example, by a numericallycontrolled oscillator (NCO) 408 that in turn receives the centerfrequency (f_(CH)) 114 for the desired channel. Embodiment 450 of FIG.4B utilizes a narrow-band (complex or real) tunable bandpass ADC 452that receives the coarsely tuned signal 110 and provides a digitaloutput to a tunable digital filter 454. For tuning the digital output tothe desired channel, the narrow-band bandpass ADC utilizes the centerfrequency (f_(CH)) 114 for the desired channel. Additional tuning of thedesired channel is provided by the tunable digital filter 454, whichutilizes a variable frequency (f_(V)) 456 generated, for example, by anumerically controlled oscillator (NCO) 458 that in turn receives thecenter frequency (f_(CH)) 114 for the desired channel. It is noted thatthese implementations for providing fine tuning of the coarsely tunedchannel spectrum do not mix the desired channel down to a fixed targetIF frequency and do not mix the desired channel to DC. Rather, theseimplementations use the analog coarse tune circuitry 102 to mix thedesired channel down to a variable location within a frequency rangearound DC, and then they perform digital conversion and digitalfiltering directly on this coarsely tuned channel spectrum.

[0047]FIG. 5A is a block diagram of an embodiment 500 for a two receiverarchitecture located on a single integrated circuit. In general, thisembodiment 500 duplicates the circuitry of FIG. 1C to produce a dualreceiver architecture. The first receiver includes analog coarse tunecircuitry 102A, large-step LO1 circuitry 106A (which outputs a first LOmixing frequency (f_(LO1))116A), and digital fine tune circuitry 104A(which receives a first center frequency (f_(CH1)) 114A for a firstdesired channel to be tuned). As discussed above, the first receivercoarsely tunes the input channel spectrum 108A to produce theintermediate coarsely tuned channel signal 110A and then digitallyprocesses this signal to finely tune the channel and to produce digitalbaseband signals for the first tuner output 112A. Similarly, the secondreceiver includes analog coarse tune circuitry 102B, large-step LO2circuitry 106B (which outputs a second LO mixing frequency(f_(LO2))116B), and digital fine tune circuitry 104B (which receives asecond center frequency (f_(CH2)) 114B for a second desired channel tobe tuned). The second receiver coarsely tunes the input channel spectrum108AB to produce the intermediate coarsely tuned channel signal 110B andthen digitally processes this signal to finely tune the channel toproduce digital baseband signals for the second tuner output 112B. It isnoted that the two tuner embodiments discussed herein are examplemulti-tuner satellite receiver embodiments and that the architecture ofthe present invention could be utilized to integrate additionalreceivers within a single integrated circuit.

[0048] Because there are two local oscillators on a single integratedcircuit in the embodiment 300 of FIG. 5A, it is possible that the sameLO mixing frequency may be selected for use by each of the tworeceivers, such that f_(LO1)=f_(LO2). In such a case, unless these twofrequencies can be precisely matched, they will likely interfere witheach other. As one solution to this problem, the dual receiverarchitecture can be implemented such that the two receivers share asingle LO mixing frequency in circumstances where the same LO mixingfrequency is in fact selected for use by each of the two receivers(f_(LO1)=f_(LO2)). In the embodiment 500 of FIG. 5A, the switch 502 isprovided so that the receivers can share the first LO mixing frequency(f_(LO1)) in such circumstances. One problem that remains, however, ishow to keep the second large-step LO2 circuitry 106B from attempting tooutput an interfering mixing frequency. Possible solutions to thisproblem include (1) turning off the second receive path and sharing thefirst tuner output, (2) turning off the second large-step LO2 circuitry106B and sharing the first LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)), for example,using a controlled switch 502 as shown in FIG. 5A, or (3) sharing thefirst LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)) and also causing the large-step LO2circuitry 106B to move to a non-interfering LO mixing frequency (f_(LO2)) that will not be used while the first LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)) isbeing shared. It is further noted that other techniques and solutionscould be implemented, if desired, for addressing the problem ofcircumstances where the second LO mixing frequency and the first LOmixing frequency would overlap. It is also again noted that thearchitecture of the present invention could be utilized to integrateadditional receivers within a single integrated circuit. For example, iffour tuners were utilized, additional receiver circuitry could beintegrated with that shown in FIG. 5A to provide additional analogcoarse tuning circuitry, digital fine tuning circuitry and LO circuitryfor a third receiver and additional analog coarse tuning circuitry,digital fine tuning circuitry and LO circuitry for a fourth receiver. Asdiscussed above, a variety of selection techniques could be implementedfor the LO frequencies provided by the different LO circuitries withrespect to the multiple receivers such that interfering overlaps of theLO mixing frequencies could be avoided.

[0049]FIGS. 5B and 5C are flow diagrams of example implementations forthe first two solutions above for handling the second LO frequency wherea single LO frequency is shared between two receivers. In embodiment 520of FIG. 5B, decision block 522 determines if the two selected LO mixingfrequencies will be the same (f_(LO1)=f_(LO2)). If the answer is “YES,”then in block 526, the first LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)) is shared,and the second local oscillator circuitry (LO2) is powered down andturned off. If the answer is “NO,” then in block 524, each LO circuitryoperates, and first LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)) is not shared. In theembodiment 540 of FIG. SC, decision block 522 similarly determines ifthe two selected LO mixing frequencies will be the same(f_(LO1)=f_(LO2)). And again, if the answer is “NO,” then in block 524,each LO circuitry operates, and first LO mixing frequency (f_(LO1)) isnot shared. If the answer is “YES,” then in block 528, the first tuneroutput 112A is shared, and the entire second receiver path circuitry ispowered down and turned off.

[0050]FIGS. 6A and 6B are block diagrams for example implementations forproviding satellite dish signals to satellite set-top box dual receiverarchitectures. In FIG. 6A, there is a single incoming signal 107 fromthe satellite dish antenna. This incoming satellite spectrum signal 107is received by LNA 105 and then split into two signals 108A and 108B toprovide inputs to each of the two receiver paths. In FIG. 6B, there aretwo singles 107A and 107B coming the satellite dish antenna. Theseincoming signals 107A and 107B are then received by two separate LNAs105A and 105B. LNA 105A provides an output signal 108A for a firstreceiver path, and LNA 105B provides an output signal 108B for a secondreceiver path. It is noted that with respect to the embodiment 600 ofFIG. 6A, both the solutions of FIGS. 5B and 5C are available. However,with the embodiment 650 of FIG. 6B, the solution of FIG. 5C would notavailable because the two input satellite transponder channel spectrums108A and 108B may not be the same and, therefore, sharing the firsttuner output 112A may cause errors with respect to the output of thesecond receiver circuitry.

[0051]FIG. 7A is a block diagram for an dual receiver implementation ofthe receiver architecture of the present invention using wide-bandanalog-to-digital converters, such as discussed with respect to FIG. 4Aabove. In embodiment 750, an input signal 107 is received by LNA 105,and LNA 105 provides two input channel spectrum signals 108A and 108B tothe two receiver paths. A first receiver path includes mixers 122A and124A, 90 degree phase shift block 126A, and large-step LO1 circuitry106A, which together output complex I/Q signals that are coarsely tunedchannel spectrum signals. These complex I/Q signals are then processedby a low pass filter 752A, a wide-band ADC 754A and a digital quadraturemixer and channel select filter 756A. A sampling clock (f_(CLK)) 760 isprovided to the wide-band ADC 754A and the digital quadrature mixer andchannel select filter 756A. For fine tuning the desired channel, thedigital quadrature mixer and channel select filter 756A utilizes avariable frequency (f_(V1)) 406A generated by numerically controlledoscillator (NCO) 408A that in turn receives the center frequency(f_(CH1)) 114A for a first desired channel. The first receiver pathoutputs quadrature I/Q baseband signals 758A as the first tuner output.A second receiver path duplicates the first receiver path and includesmixers 122B and 124B, 90 degree phase shift block 126B, large-step LO2circuitry 106B, low pass filter 752B, a wide-band ADC 754B and a digitalquadrature mixer and channel select filter 756B. As with the firstreceiver path, a sampling clock (f_(CLK)) 760 is provided to thewide-band ADC 754B and the digital quadrature mixer and channel selectfilter 756B. For fine tuning the desired channel, the digital quadraturemixer and channel select filter 756B utilizes a variable frequency(f_(V2)) 406B generated by NCO 408B that in turn receives the centerfrequency (f_(CH2)) 114B for a second desired channel. It is noted thatthe embodiment 750 could also have additional circuitry for handlingoverlaps between the first and second LO mixing frequencies (f_(LO1),f_(LO2)), as discussed with respect to FIGS. 5A-C and 6A-B above.

[0052]FIG. 7B is a block diagram for a dual receiver implementation ofthe receiver architecture of the present invention using complex tunablebandpass delta-sigma analog-to-digital converters, such as discussedwith respect to FIG. 4B above. In embodiment 700, an input signal 107 isreceived by LNA 105, and LNA 105 provides two input channel spectrumsignals 108A and 108B to the two receiver paths. A first receiver pathincludes mixers 122A and 124A, 90 degree phase shift block 126A, andlarge-step LO1 circuitry 106A, which together output complex I/Q signalsthat are coarsely tuned channel spectrum signals 7081 and 708Q. Thesecomplex I/Q signals are then processed by a complex tunable bandpassfilter 702A with outputs 710I and 710Q, a complex tunable bandpassdelta-sigma (ΔΣ) ADC 704A with outputs 712A and 712Q, and a digitaldown-converter and decimator 706A. A sampling clock (f_(CLK)) 705 isprovided to complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A and to the digitaldown-converter and decimator 706A. For digital processing and tuning ofthe desired channel, the complex tunable bandpass filter 702A and thecomplex tunable ΔΣ ADC 704A receive the center frequency (f_(CH1)) 114Afor a first desired channel. For further fine tuning of the desiredchannel, the digital down-converter and decimator 706A utilizes avariable frequency (f_(V1)) 456A generated by numerically controlledoscillator (NCO) 458A that in turn receives the center frequency(f_(CH1)) 114A. The first receiver path outputs quadrature I/Q basebandsignals 714I and 714Q as the first tuner output. A second receiver pathduplicates the first receiver path and includes mixers 122B and 124B, 90degree phase shift block 126B, large-step LO2 circuitry 106B, complextunable bandpass filter 702B, a complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704B anda digital down-converter and decimator 706B. As with the first receiverpath, a sampling clock (f_(CLK)) 705 is provided to the complex tunablebandpass ΔΣ ADC 704B and the digital down-converter and decimator 706B.For digital processing and tuning of the desired channel, the complextunable bandpass filter 702B and the complex tunable ΔΣ ADC 704B receivethe center frequency (f_(CH2)) 114B for a second desired channel. Forfurther fine tuning of the desired channel, the digital down-converterand decimator 706B utilizes a variable frequency (f_(V2)) 456B generatedby NCO 458B that in turn receives the center frequency (f_(CH2)) 114B.It is noted that the embodiment 750 could also have additional circuitryfor handling overlaps between the first and second LO mixing frequencies(f_(LO1), f_(LO2)), as discussed with respect to FIGS. 5A-C and 6A-Babove.

[0053] It is noted that with respect to embodiments of FIGS. 7A and 7B,the required bandwidth for ADCs 754A/B and the tuning range for ADCs704A/B can be limited to positive frequencies if desired. Negativefrequencies can be tuned by applying the complex conjugate of the Q pathsignal to the filters 102A/B and 752A/B. This negative frequencyconversion circuitry, therefore, can be placed after the mixers 124A/Bin each of the embodiments 700 and 750. This pre-processingadvantageously limits the required processing range for the complexanalog processing done by the ADCs 704A/B.

[0054]FIG. 7C provides an example embodiment for converting negativefrequencies to reduce the needed tuning range of the complex tunablebandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B to positive frequencies. As depicted, the I and Qpath signals received by the complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B arefirst processed by the complex conjugate converter 770. In theembodiment shown, the I path signal passes through the complex conjugateconverter 770 and is provided to the complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC704A/B. The Q path signal is connected to the “0” input of themultiplexer (MUX) 774. The Q path signal is also connected to gain stage772 (−1 gain), which in turn provides an output that is connected to the“1” input of the MUX 774. The conjugate signal (CONJ SIGNAL) used tocontrol the MUX 774 is the center frequency (f_(CH)) 114A/B that is alsoutilized by the complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B. As stated above,by using this complex conjugate converter to process the I and Q pathsignals, the complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B can beadvantageously limited to a positive tuning range thereby reducing thebandwidth requirement for the complex tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B. Itis further noted that for a fully differential design, the −1 gain forgain stage 772 can be implemented relatively simply by swapping the twosingle-ended positive and negative signals that would be received bygain stage 772 in such a fully differential design.

[0055]FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B are a block diagram and response diagram,respectively, that describe one implementation for calibrating andhandling tuning errors in a bandpass delta-sigma converter within areceiver, such as tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704A/B in FIG. 7B. Thisimplementation takes advantage of the result that an improperly tuneddelta-sigma converter will typically produce large amounts of noise inthe final output of the receiver.

[0056] Looking first to FIGS. 8A, a block diagram is depicted of anembodiment 800 for calibrating tuning errors with respect to a bandpassdelta-sigma converter within a receiver, such as the complex tunablebandpass delta-sigma analog-to-digital converters in the embodiment ofFIG. 7B. This embodiment 800 detects energy in the receiver output andprovides a tuning offset signal (ω_(SET)) that adjusts the tunablebandpass ΔΣ ADC 704 to correct for errors in its center frequency.Similar to the embodiment 700 of FIG. 7B, embodiment 800 also includes atunable bandpass filter 702 and a digital down-converter and decimator706, which itself includes a digital quadrature mixer 806 and a channelselect low pass filter (LPF) 808. The output baseband I/Q signals 714are sent to an energy detector 810 that determines noise in the outputsignal. The energy detector 810 provides an output to the auto-tunecontrol circuitry 812. The auto-tune control circuitry 812 in turnprovides the tuning offset signal (ω_(SET)) to the tunable bandpass ΔΣADC 704. And the auto-tune control circuitry 812 also sends an auto-tunecontrol signal 816 to a multiplexer (MUX) 802. The multiplexer 802chooses between the channel spectrum I/Q signal 708 and ground andoutputs a signal 804 to the tunable bandpass filter 702. In operation,if the ΔΣ ADC 704 is mistuned, then the noise within the output basebandI/Q signals 714 will increase. Thus, by adjusting the tuning offsetsignal (ω_(SET)) 814 to reduce and minimize this noise, the ΔΣ ADC 704can be tuned or calibrated to compensate for tuning errors in the ΔΣ ADC704.

[0057]FIG. 8B is a diagram representing the signal correction of FIG.8A. In the noise level representation 850, response line 852 representsthe tuning response of the ΔΣ ADC 704. The channel 854 represents adesired channel located at a channel center frequency (ω₀). The ΔΣ ADC704 is ideally tuned so that its notch falls on the channel centerfrequency (ω₀); however, the notch for the ΔΣ ADC 704, as shown, islocated at a first frequency (ω₁). The difference between the desirednotch location at the channel center frequency (ω₀) and the actual notchlocation at the first frequency (ω₁) represents an error amount(ω_(ERROR)) in the tuning for the ΔΣ ADC 704. As represented by line856, the tuning offset signal (ω_(SET)) acts to move the notch for theΔΣ ADC 704 so that it more closely aligns with the channel centerfrequency (ω₀). As depicted in FIG. 8B, the center frequency (ω₀) forthe desired channel 854 is offset from the notch for the ΔΣ ADC 704. Inoperation, the digital quadrature mixer 806 would multiply the mistunedoutput of the ΔΣ ADC 704 by exp(−jω₀n) thereby causing significant noisein the desired output channel 854, which was selected and tuned by thechannel select LPF 808. Thus, due to the tuning error (ω_(ERROR)) in theΔΣ ADC 704, the noise at the output 714 will be much greater than forcircumstance where this error is adjusted so that it approaches zero.

[0058] As indicated above, the technique of FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B takesadvantage of the knowledge that an improperly tuned delta-sigmaconverter notch will produce large amounts of noise in the channel tunedby a channel select filter 808. During auto-tune in the embodimentdepicted, the input to the ΔΣ ADC 704 could be forced to zero byselecting ground through the MUX 802. The output energy can then beminimized by adjusting the tuning offset signal (ω_(SET)) 814 andthereby adjusting the tuning error (ω_(ERROR)). Once a minimum is found,the auto tuning or calibration could be completed and normal operationcould proceed by changing the selection of MUX 802 to the input channelspectrum I/Q signal 708. It is noted that a auto-tune algorithm couldimplemented utilizing 30 to 60 discrete settings for the tuning offsetsignal (ω_(SET)) 814, such that the auto-tune algorithm could beexecuted very rapidly. In addition, the auto-tune algorithm could beexecuted each time a different channel were selected. And this auto-tuneprocedure and implementation could also be used to calibrate a bandpassfilter, such as tunable bandpass filter 702, that sits in front of theΔΣ ADC 704. In this case, a master-slave approach could be used, ifdesired, such that the filter is constructed using similar (or matched)complex integrators as used by the circuitry of the ΔΣ ADC 704, asdiscussed below with respect to FIG. 8C. It is further noted that theclock provided to the device that drives the sampling of the ΔΣ ADC 704and the digital quadrature mixer 806 can be used as an accurate timereference for the auto-tune implementation.

[0059]FIG. 8C is a block diagram for a master-slave tuning arrangementbetween a tunable bandpass analog-to-digital converter (master) and atunable bandpass filter (slave). In general, master-slave tuning ofsecond circuit (slave) based upon a first circuit (master) is typicallyimplemented by building the second circuit out of similar or identicalcircuit building blocks as the first circuit. One can then fine tune thebuilding blocks of the first circuit through a feedback methodology. Thecontrol (or offset) signals which are derived out of the feed backmethodology are applied not only to the first circuit but also to thesecond circuit as well. Because the second circuit was not a part ofthis feed back operation, the second circuit can be tuned by the notionof similarity (or matching). The second circuit, in this case, is calledthe slave whereas the first circuit involved in the feedback operationis called the master. Usually, the circuit selected as the mastercircuit will have a topology that is reasonably amenable to a feedbackmethodology where as the circuit selected as the slave circuit is oftennot amenable to a feedback operation. One typical example of amaster-slave tuning implementation is fine tuning of a filter by slavingit into an oscillator which has the same integrators.

[0060] Looking back to FIG. 8C, the embodiment depicted utilizes thetunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704 as the master tuning circuit that allows forfine tuning of the tunable bandpass filter 702, which is the slavecircuit. To implement this master-slave approach, for example, thetunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704 can be built out of identical or similarcomplex integrators as used for the filter 702. In operation, somefeedback operation is conducted on the output 712 of the tunablebandpass ΔΣ ADC 704, and a master feedback signal 876 is produced. Thismaster feedback signal 876 is applied to the tuning control circuitry812, which in turn provides a master tuning signal 814 to the tunablebandpass ΔΣ ADC 704. This feedback operation, for example, may be theenergy detection implementation discussed above with respect to FIGS. 8Aand 8B. In addition, the master tuning signal 814 may be the tuningoffset signal (ω_(SET)) 814, and the input signal to the tunablebandpass filter 702 could be the input signal 804, as discussed abovewith respect to FIGS. 8A and 8B. Once the feedback operation and thetuning control circuitry has tuned the tunable bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704, themaster tuning signal 814 is the applied by similarity (or matching) tothe tunable bandpass filter 702 as the matched slave tuning signal 878.

[0061]FIGS. 9A-9E are block and signal diagrams that describeimplementations for the digital down-converter and decimator 706A/B ofFIG. 7B. These implementations utilize multiple stages of digital mixingand down conversion to bring the output 712 of the bandpass ΔΣ ADC704A/B to baseband I/Q signals. The output 712 of the bandpass ΔΣ ADC704A/B, for example, can be a complex 1-bit digital signal sampled atF_(S) with quantization noise shaping designed to have a minimumcentered at the desired channel center frequency (ω₀). The multi-stagedimplementation incrementally filters and decimates this signal to reducethe design requirements of each stage.

[0062]FIG. 9A is a block diagram of the multi-stage architecture 900 fora digital down-converter and decimator 706 usable in the embodiment 700of FIG. 7B. The input 712 from a bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704 is processed by aseries of cascaded stages, which as shown include STAGE1 910A, STAGE2910B . . . STAGE(N) 910C. Each stage provides an output to the nextstage, as indicated by signal 905 from STAGE1 910A to STAGE2 910B and bysignal 982 that would be from STAGE(N−1) to STAGE(N) 910C. It is notedthat the stages 910A, 910B . . . 910C (STAGE1, STAGE2 . . . STAGE(N))could all be implemented with similar circuitry, if desired.

[0063]FIG. 9B is a block diagram of example circuitry for stages 910within the multi-stage architecture of FIG. 9A. In the stage embodimentdepicted, the stage input is received by mixer 906, which digitallymixes the stage input with a mixing signal 912. The resulting signal ispassed through a low pass filter (LPF) 902. This LPF 902 can be tunable,if desired, and the tuning signal 911 can be used to tune the tunableLPF 902. The output of the LPF 902 is then decimated down by decimator904 to provide the stage output. The decimator 904 can have a fixeddecimation rate, if desired, or can have a variable decimation rate(down-by-M) that is controlled by decimation rate selector signal 915.The output signal from the stage 910 is then sent to the next stage. Forexample, where the stage is the STAGE1 910A, the input signal to thestage would be signal 712 from the ΔΣ ADC 704, and the output signalwould be signal 905 that is received by STAGE2 910B. It is noted thatthe values for the digital mixing signal 912 and the decimation rate forthe decimator 904 in each stage can be selected, as desired, dependingupon the spectrum segmentation strategy selected.

[0064]FIGS. 9C, 9D and 9E described an example implementation of themulti-stage architecture of FIG. 9A utilizing a plurality of identicalor similar non-final stages followed by a final stage that brings thesignal down to a desired or optimal signal processing rate.

[0065] First, looking to FIG. 9C, a block diagram is depicted forexample implementation 950 of the architecture of FIG. 9A utilizing afixed decimation rate in non-final stages and a variable decimation ratein the final stage. In this embodiment 950, the fixed decimation ratestages, or non-tunable stages, include one or more cascaded stages.There are two example non-final, non-tunable stages depicted, namelySTAGE1 910A and STAGE2 910B. STAGE1 910A receives the input signal 712processes it with mixer 906A, LPF 902A and down-by-two decimator 904Abefore providing an output signal to the next stage. STAGE2 910B usesthe same or similar structure and processes the signal from STAGE1 910Awith mixer 906B, LPF 902B and down-by-two decimator 904B beforeproviding an output signal to the next stage. In the embodimentdepicted, the mixers 906A, 906B digitally mix their respective inputsignals with mixing signals 912A, 912B, and these mixing signals 912A,912B . . . used by each stage are represented by the formula:exp[j(2π/N)n] where N={±1, ±2, ±4} and where “n” represents the timesequence index. In addition, as shown in FIG. 9C, each stage can use adifferent exponential source as a mixing signal with each mixing signalusing a different N, such as N1 for mixing signal 912A, N2 for mixingsignal 912B, and so on, where N1, N2, . . . ={±1, ±2, ±4}. As discussedfurther below with respect to FIG. 9D, for each non-tunable stage inFIG. 9C, the digital mixer 906 for the stage can be configured todigital mix the input to the stage with a mixing signal selected from aplurality of predetermined mixing signals that are chosen to reducecomplexity for calculations used for the digital mixing. In addition,the mixing signal selected for a particular stage (as determined in thisembodiment with N1 for stage 910A, N2 for stage 910B, and so on) can bemade to depend upon the location of the channel center frequency withinthe input signal to the stage so that the spectrum for the input signalis rotated such that the desired channel falls within a desiredfrequency range.

[0066] For the last stage 980, the input signal 982 from the next tolast stage is first processed by mixer 992, which digitally mixes thesignal 982 with a mixing signal 992 represented by the formula:exp[jω₁n] where “ω₁” represents the frequency of the desired channel andwhere “n” represents the time sequence index. The resulting mixed signalis then sent to LPF 986, which may be a tunable LPF, if desired. Iftunable, the LPF 986 can be tuned utilizing the tuning signal 994. Theoutput from LPF 986 is then decimated by variable decimator 988(divide-by-R). A decimation rate selection signal 990 provides a controlsignal to the variable decimator 988 to determine its decimation rate.The resulting output signal 714 provides the output baseband I/Q signalsfor the embodiment 700 of FIG. 7B.

[0067]FIG. 9D is a diagram for determining a factor (N) used in thenon-final stage implementations of FIG. 9C based upon the frequencylocation (ω) of the desired channel. Frequency ranges 952, 954, 956, 958and 960 represent various ranges within which a desired channel may belocated within the output of the bandpass ΔΣ ADC 704. Depending upon thefrequency range within which the desired channel falls, the value for“N” will be set to a particular value for the equation that describesthe mixing signal 912. Region A, represented by range 952, spans from−π/4 to π/4 and uses N=1. Region B, represented by range 954, spans fromπ/4 to 3π/4 and uses N=−4. Region C, represented by range 956, spansfrom −3π/4 to −π/4 and uses N=4. Region D, represented by range 958,spans from 3π/4 to π and uses N=−2. And region E, represented by range960, spans from −π to −3π/4 and uses N=2. Advantageously, for thisimplementation, the digital multiplies that must occur in digital mixer906 are relatively trivial:

[0068] N=±1: exp[j2πn]=. . . 1, 1, 1, 1, . . .

[0069] N=±2: exp[±jπn]=. . . 1, −1, 1, −1, . . .

[0070] N=+4: exp[j(90 /2)n]=. . . , 1, j, −1, −j, . . .

[0071] N=−4: exp[−j(π/2)n]=. . . 1, −j, −1, j, . . .

[0072] In operation, the desired channel will lie somewhere in the rangeof frequencies defined by regions A, B, C, D and E. Because the locationof the channel is known, the value for “N” can be set to the propervalue, as indicated above, such that after multiplication in digitalmixer 906, the spectrum is rotated and the desired channel is withinregion A.

[0073]FIG. 9E is a response diagram of an example low pass filter 902for the non-final stage implementations of FIG. 9C. The line 970represents the relevant response for the LPF 902 depending upon thefrequency location (ω) of the desired channel. The gap 972 represents astop band attenuation for the LPF 902.

[0074] In operation, the multi-stage implementation 950 described withrespect to FIGS. 9C, 9D and 9E uses a plurality of non-final cascadedstages that each include digital mixers to multiply the output of the ΔΣADC 704 in order to center the signal near ω=0 and that each applies themixer output to a low pass filter and a down-by-two decimator. The finalstage is designed to have variable decimation so that the channel to betuned is finally decimated to the baseband rate. Advantageously, bybreaking up the digital mixing into multiple stages, this implementationreduces power requirements at the highest sample rates, reduces theresolution required for the digital mixers, and reduces the complexityof each stage including the final stage.

[0075] Further modifications and alternative embodiments of thisinvention will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of thisdescription. It will be recognized, therefore, that the presentinvention is not limited by these example arrangements. Accordingly,this description is to be construed as illustrative only and is for thepurpose of teaching those skilled in the art the manner of carrying outthe invention. It is to be understood that the forms of the inventionherein shown and described are to be taken as the presently preferredembodiments. Various changes may be made in the implementations andarchitectures for database processing. For example, equivalent elementsmay be substituted for those illustrated and described herein, andcertain features of the invention may be utilized independently of theuse of other features, all as would be apparent to one skilled in theart after having the benefit of this description of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for tuning multiple channels withmulti-tuner satellite receiver circuitry on a single integrated circuit,comprising: providing at least two tuners on a single integrated circuitcomprising first receiver circuitry and second receiver circuitry, thefirst and second receiver circuitry configured to operate at the sametime; with the first receiver circuitry, receiving a first satellitesignal spectrum including a plurality of transponder channels within afrequency range, each transponder channel including a plurality ofprogram channels; receiving a selection signal identifying a firsttransponder channel to be tuned; mixing the first satellite signalspectrum with a first coarse-tune analog mixing signal to generate afirst coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and digitally processing the firstcoarsely tuned signal spectrum to fine tune the first desiredtransponder channel and to produce digital baseband signals representingthe first desired transponder channel; with the second receivercircuitry, receiving a second satellite signal spectrum including aplurality of transponder channels within a frequency range, eachtransponder channel including a plurality of program channels; receivinga selection signal identifying a second transponder channel to be tuned;mixing the second satellite signal spectrum with a second coarse-tuneanalog mixing signal to generate a second coarsely tuned signalspectrum; and digitally processing the second coarsely tuned signalspectrum to fine tune the second desired transponder channel and toproduce digital baseband signals representing the second desiredtransponder channel; and concurrently providing the digital basebandsignals for the first desired transponder channel and the digitalbaseband signals for the second desired transponder channel as outputsfrom the first and second receiver circuitry.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising for each of the first and second receiver circuitry,separating the frequency range of the satellite signal spectrum into aplurality of frequency bins and associating at least one coarse-tuneanalog mixing signal with each frequency bin.
 3. The method of claim 2,further comprising for each of the first and second receiver circuitry,determining within which bin the desired channel falls and selecting theanalog mixing signal associated with that bin.
 4. The method of claim 3,wherein for each of the first and second receiver circuitry, theselecting step further comprises selecting a different analog mixingsignal if the desired transponder channel overlaps the analog mixingsignal associated with the bin within which the desired transponderchannel falls.
 5. The method of claim 3, further comprising sharing thefirst analog mixing signal if the first and second analog mixing signalswill likely interfere with each other.
 6. The method of claim 5, whereinthe sharing step further comprises turning off a controlled oscillatorwithin the second receiver circuitry while the first analog mixingsignal is being shared.
 7. The method of claim 5, further comprisingsharing the output of the first receiver circuitry if the first andsecond analog mixing signals will likely interfere and turning off thesecond receiver circuitry while the output of the first receivercircuitry is being shared.
 8. The method of claim 2, further comprisingconfiguring the frequency bins not to overlap.
 9. The method of claim 2,further comprising configuring the frequency bins such that one or moreof the frequency bins overlap in frequency ranges.
 10. The method ofclaim 9, further comprising organizing the overlapping frequency bins astwo sets of non-overlapping frequency bins, the first set overlappingthe second set.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the digitalprocessing step for the first and second receives each comprises using awide-band analog-to-digital converter to convert the coarsely tunedsignal spectrum to digital signals and using a tunable digital filter totune the desired transponder channel.
 12. The method of claim 1, whereinthe digital processing step for the first and second receivers eachcomprises using a narrow-band tunable bandpass analog-to-digitalconverter to tune the desired transponder channel and to convert thecoarsely tuned signal spectrum to digital signals and using a tunabledigital filter to further tune the desired transponder channel.
 13. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the first and second satellite signalspectrums are the same.
 14. The method of claim 1, further comprisingdemodulating the first tuned transponder channel to tune a first programchannel within the first tuned transponder channel, and demodulating thesecond tuned transponder channel to tune a second program channel withinthe second tuned transponder channel.
 15. The method of claim 14,further comprising utilizing the second tuned program channel to providea data stream for personal video recorder operations.
 16. The method ofclaim 14, further comprising utilizing the second tuned program channelto provide a data stream for picture-in-picture operations.
 17. A methodfor tuning multiple channels with multi-tuner satellite receivercircuitry on a single integrated circuit, comprising: providing at leasttwo tuners on a single integrated circuit comprising first receivercircuitry and second receiver circuitry, the first and second receivercircuitry configured to operate at the same time; with the firstreceiver circuitry, receiving a first signal spectrum including aplurality of channels within a frequency range; receiving a selectionsignal identifying a first channel to be tuned; mixing the firstsatellite signal spectrum with a first coarse-tune analog mixing signalto generate a first coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and digitallyprocessing the first coarsely tuned signal spectrum to fine tune thefirst desired channel and to produce digital baseband signalsrepresenting the first desired channel; with the second receivercircuitry, receiving a second signal spectrum including a plurality ofchannels within a frequency range; receiving a selection signalidentifying a second channel to be tuned; mixing the second signalspectrum with a second coarse-tune analog mixing signal to generate asecond coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and digitally processing thesecond coarsely tuned signal spectrum to fine tune the second desiredchannel and to produce digital baseband signals representing the seconddesired channel; and concurrently providing the digital baseband signalsfor the first desired channel and the digital baseband signals for thesecond desired channel as outputs from the first and second receivercircuitry.
 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising for each ofthe first and second receiver circuitry, separating the frequency rangeof the signal spectrum into a plurality of frequency bins andassociating at least one coarse-tune analog mixing signal with eachfrequency bin.
 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising for eachof the first and second receiver circuitry, determining within which binthe desired channel falls and selecting the analog mixing signalassociated with that bin.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein for eachof the first and second receiver circuitry, the selecting step furthercomprises selecting a different analog mixing signal if the desiredchannel overlaps the analog mixing signal associated with the bin withinwhich the desired channel falls.
 21. The method of claim 20, furthercomprising sharing the first analog mixing signal if the first andsecond analog mixing signals will likely interfere with each other. 22.The method of claim 18, further comprising configuring the frequencybins not to overlap.
 23. The method of claim 18, further comprisingconfiguring the frequency bins such that one or more of the frequencybins overlap in frequency ranges.
 24. The method of claim 23, furthercomprising organizing the overlapping frequency bins as two sets ofnon-overlapping frequency bins, the first set overlapping the secondset.
 25. The method of claim 17, wherein the digital processing stepsfor the first and second receivers each comprises using a wide-bandanalog-to-digital converter to convert the coarsely tuned signalspectrum to digital signals and using a tunable digital filter to tunethe desired transponder channel.
 26. The method of claim 17, wherein thedigital processing step for the first and second receivers eachcomprises using a narrow-band tunable bandpass analog-to-digitalconverter to tune the desired transponder channel and to convert thecoarsely tuned signal spectrum to digital signals and using a tunabledigital filter to further tune the desired transponder channel.
 27. Themethod of claim 17, wherein the first and second signal spectrums arethe same.
 28. The method of claim 17, wherein the first and secondsignal spectrums comprise satellite channel signal spectrums.
 29. Amulti-tuner satellite receiver system for tuning multiple channels withmulti-tuner satellite receiver circuitry on a single integrated circuit,comprising: first receiver circuitry within an integrated circuit,comprising: first local oscillator (LO) circuitry having a first channelselection signal as an input and having a first coarse-tune analogmixing signal as an output, the first output mixing signal beingselected from a plurality of predetermined output mixing signalsdepending upon a first desired transponder channel to be tuned; firstanalog coarse tune circuitry having the first coarse-tune analog mixingsignal as an input and having a first satellite signal spectrum as aninput, the first satellite signal spectrum including a plurality oftransponder channels within a frequency range, and the first analogcoarse tune circuitry being configured to use the first coarse-tuneanalog mixing signal to output a first coarsely tuned signal spectrum;and first digital fine tune circuitry having the first coarsely tunedsignal spectrum as an input and having as an output digital basebandsignals for the first desired transponder channel; and second receivercircuitry within the same integrated circuit, comprising: second localoscillator (LO) circuitry having a second channel selection signal as aninput and having a second coarse-tune analog mixing signal as an output,the second output mixing signal being selected from a plurality ofpredetermined output mixing signals depending upon a second desiredtransponder channel to be tuned; second analog coarse tune circuitryhaving the second coarse-tune analog mixing signal as an input andhaving a second satellite signal spectrum as an input, the secondsatellite signal spectrum including a plurality of transponder channelswithin a frequency range, and the second analog coarse tune circuitrybeing configured to use the second coarse-tune analog mixing signal tooutput a second coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and second digital finetune circuitry having the second coarsely tuned signal spectrum as aninput and having as an output digital baseband signals for the seconddesired transponder channel.
 30. The multi-tuner satellite receiversystem of claim 29, wherein for each of the first and second receivercircuitry, the frequency range of the satellite signal spectrum isorganized into a plurality of frequency bins and at least onecoarse-tune analog mixing signal is associated with each frequency bin.31. The multi-tuner satellite receiver system of claim 30, furthercomprising for each of the first and second receiver circuitry, theanalog mixing signal selected for output by the LO circuitry is ananalog mixing signal associated with the bin within which the desiredtransponder channel falls.
 32. The multi-tuner satellite receiver systemof claim 31, wherein for each of the first and second receivercircuitry, a different analog mixing signal is selected if the desiredtransponder channel overlaps the analog mixing signal associated withthe bin within which the desired transponder channel falls.
 33. Themulti-tuner satellite receiver system of claim 32, wherein the firstanalog mixing signal is shared by the second receiver circuitry if thefirst and second analog mixing signals will likely interfere with eachother.
 34. The multi-tuner satellite receiver system of claim 30,wherein the frequency bins are configured not to overlap.
 35. Themulti-tuner satellite receiver system of claim 30, wherein the frequencybins are configured such that one or more of the frequency bins overlapin frequency ranges.
 36. The multi-tuner satellite receiver system ofclaim 29, wherein the first and second digital fine tune circuitry eachcomprises a wide-band analog-to-digital converter having the coarselytuned signal spectrum as an input and having digital signals as anoutput, and also comprises a tunable digital filter configured to tunethe desired transponder channel.
 37. The multi-tuner satellite receiversystem of claim 29, wherein the first and second digital fine tunecircuitry each comprises a narrow-band tunable bandpassanalog-to-digital converter configured to tune the desired transponderchannel and to convert the coarsely tuned signal spectrum to digitalsignals, and also comprises a tunable digital filter to further tune thedesired transponder channel.
 38. The multi-tuner satellite receiversystem of claim 29, wherein the first and second satellite signalspectrums are the same.
 39. The multi-tuner satellite receiver system ofclaim 29, wherein the first and second LO circuitry each comprisesphase-lock-loop (PLL) circuitry including a phase detector and acontrolled oscillator, the phase detector receiving a first signalrepresentative of a reference frequency, receiving a second signalrepresentative of an output frequency of the controlled oscillator, andgenerating at least one control signal to adjust the output frequency ofthe controlled oscillator.
 40. The multi-tuner satellite receiver systemof claim 39, wherein the first and second LO circuitry each furthercomprises control circuitry configured to receive a channel selectionsignal and to control divider circuitry that provides the first andsecond signals to the phase detector based upon divided versions of thereference frequency and the output of the controlled oscillator, thecontrol circuitry acting to select the coarse-tune analog mixing signaloutput by the PLL circuitry.
 41. The multi-tuner satellite receiversystem of claim 39, wherein the controlled oscillators for the first andsecond LO circuitry utilize RC-based resonant structures.
 42. The dualsatellite receiver system of claim 29, further comprising a firstdemodulator coupled to receive a digital baseband output signal from thefirst receiver representative of a first tuned transponder channel, thefirst demodulator being configured to tune a first program channelwithin the first tuned transponder channel and to provide the firsttuned program channel as an output, and further comprising a seconddemodulator coupled to receive a digital baseband output signal from thesecond receiver representative of a second tuned transponder channel,the second demodulator being configured to tune a second program channelwithin the second tuned transponder channel and to provide the secondtuned program channel as an output
 43. The multi-tuner satellitereceiver system of claim 42, wherein the second tuned program channel isutilized to provide a data stream for personal video recorderoperations.
 44. The multi-tuner satellite receiver system of claim 42,wherein the second tuned program channel is utilized to provide a datastream for picture-in-picture operations.
 45. A multi-tuner receiversystem for tuning multiple channels with multi-tuner receiver circuitryon a single integrated circuit, comprising: first receiver circuitrywithin an integrated circuit, comprising: first local oscillator (LO)circuitry having a first channel selection signal as an input and havinga first coarse-tune analog mixing signal as an output, the first outputmixing signal being selected from a plurality of predetermined outputmixing signals depending upon a first desired channel to be tuned; firstanalog coarse tune circuitry having the first coarse-tune analog mixingsignal as an input and having a first signal spectrum as an input, thefirst signal spectrum including a plurality of channels within afrequency range, and the first analog coarse tune circuitry beingconfigured to use the first coarse-tune analog mixing signal to output afirst coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and first digital fine tunecircuitry having the first coarsely tuned signal spectrum as an inputand having as an output digital baseband signals for the first desiredchannel; and second receiver circuitry within the same integratedcircuit, comprising: second local oscillator (LO) circuitry having asecond channel selection signal as an input and having a secondcoarse-tune analog mixing signal as an output, the second output mixingsignal being selected from a plurality of predetermined output mixingsignals depending upon a second desired channel to be tuned; secondanalog coarse tune circuitry having the second coarse-tune analog mixingsignal as an input and having a second signal spectrum as an input, thesecond signal spectrum including a plurality of channels within afrequency range, and the second analog coarse tune circuitry beingconfigured to use the second coarse-tune analog mixing signal to outputa second coarsely tuned signal spectrum; and second digital fine tunecircuitry having the second coarsely tuned signal spectrum as an inputand having as an output digital baseband signals for the second desiredchannel.
 46. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 45, wherein for each ofthe first and second receiver circuitry, the frequency range of thesignal spectrum is organized into a plurality of frequency bins and atleast one coarse-tune analog mixing signal is associated with eachfrequency bin.
 47. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 46, furthercomprising for each of the first and second receiver circuitry, theanalog mixing signal selected for output by the LO circuitry is ananalog mixing signal associated with the bin within which the desiredchannel falls.
 48. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 46, wherein foreach of the first and second receiver circuitry, a different analogmixing signal is selected if the desired channel overlaps the analogmixing signal associated with the bin within which the desired channelfalls.
 49. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 48, wherein the firstanalog mixing signal is shared by the second receiver circuitry if thefirst and second analog mixing signals will likely interfere with eachother.
 50. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 45, wherein the first andsecond digital fine tune circuitry each comprises a wide-bandanalog-to-digital converter having the coarsely tuned signal spectrum asan input and having digital signals as an output, and also comprises atunable digital filter configured to tune the desired channel.
 51. Themulti-tuner receiver of claim 45, wherein the first and second digitalfine tune circuitry each comprises a narrow-band tunable bandpassanalog-to-digital converter configured to tune the desired channel andto convert the coarsely tuned signal spectrum to digital signals, andalso comprises a tunable digital filter to further tune the desiredchannel.
 52. The multi-tuner receiver of claim 45, further comprisingthird receiver circuitry and fourth receiver circuitry within theintegrated circuit, each of the third and fourth receiver circuitry,comprising: local oscillator (LO) circuitry having a channel selectionsignal as an input and having a coarse-tune analog mixing signal as anoutput, the output mixing signal being selected from a plurality ofpredetermined output mixing signals depending upon a desired channel tobe tuned; analog coarse tune circuitry having the coarse-tune analogmixing signal as an input and having a signal spectrum as an input, thesignal spectrum including a plurality of channels within a frequencyrange, and the analog coarse tune circuitry being configured to use thecoarse-tune analog mixing signal to output a coarsely tuned signalspectrum; and digital fine tune circuitry having the coarsely tunedsignal spectrum as an input and having as an output digital basebandsignals for the desired channel.